Why This Option is Necessary

Oct 13, 2025 by miodeya.com 101 views

Enhancing Streamlink's Recording Feature: Request for --record-continue-no-player Option

Introduction

Streamlink is a powerful command-line utility for streaming media from various platforms. Its flexibility and customization options make it a favorite among users. Recently, the addition of the --record option has been a game-changer for many users, allowing them to record streams directly to disk. However, some users, like you, have noticed that the default behavior of this option doesn't quite match their desired outcome. In this article, we'll explore the current state of the --record option and discuss the need for a new feature that would allow users to continue recording even if the player program closes.

Current State of --record Option

The --record option in Streamlink is a significant improvement over the previous version. It allows users to record streams directly to disk, which is a huge time-saver and reduces the need for additional software. However, as you've pointed out, the default behavior of this option doesn't quite match the desired outcome. When the player program closes or crashes, the recording stops, which can be frustrating for users who want to continue recording even if the player is no longer running.

The Need for --record-continue-no-player Option

The --record-continue-no-player option would address this issue by allowing users to continue recording to the file on disk even if the player program closes. This would be a significant improvement over the current behavior and would provide users with more flexibility and control over their recording process. The primary output would still be the stream to file, and the player would be a secondary consideration.

Why This Option is Necessary

There are several reasons why the --record-continue-no-player option is necessary. Firstly, it would provide users with more flexibility and control over their recording process. Secondly, it would address the issue of the recording stopping when the player program closes, which can be frustrating for users. Finally, it would bring Streamlink's recording feature more in line with the desired behavior of users.

How This Option Would Work

If the --record-continue-no-player option were implemented, it would work as follows:

The primary output would still be the stream to file.
The player would be a secondary consideration.
If the player program closes or crashes, the recording would continue to the file on disk.
The user would have the option to specify the output file and the format of the recording.

Benefits of This Option

The --record-continue-no-player option would have several benefits for users. Firstly, it would provide users with more flexibility and control over their recording process. Secondly, it would address the issue of the recording stopping when the player program closes, which can be frustrating for users. Finally, it would bring Streamlink's recording feature more in line with the desired behavior of users.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the --record-continue-no-player option is a necessary feature that would provide users with more flexibility and control over their recording process. It would address the issue of the recording stopping when the player program closes and bring Streamlink's recording feature more in line with the desired behavior of users. We hope that this feature will be implemented in the future and look forward to hearing from the Streamlink community on this matter.

Checklist

[x] This is a feature request and not a different kind of issue
[x] I have read the contribution guidelines
[x] I have checked the list of open and recently closed feature requests

Collaboration

[x] My request is genuine and in the best interest of the project
[x] I will provide feedback should a pull request be opened with a new feature implementation

Description

I noticed --record was added since the last time I really looked over the docs. It's great, it does ALMOST exactly what I want. Tee the output to disk and to a playback tool at the same time.

However it's default behavior if the player's ever closed or crashes doesn't match the behavior I desire.

--record-continue-no-player describes that behavior; the primary output is the stream to file, the player was a secondary consideration. Please continue recording to the file on disk even if for any reason the player program closes.

I don't see any obvious existing commands that achieve that result, but it's possible those were added and the CLI webpage is out of date.
Frequently Asked Questions: --record-continue-no-player Option

Introduction

In our previous article, we discussed the need for a new feature in Streamlink that would allow users to continue recording even if the player program closes. This feature, known as --record-continue-no-player, would provide users with more flexibility and control over their recording process. In this article, we'll answer some of the most frequently asked questions about this feature.

Q: What is the purpose of the --record-continue-no-player option?

A: The primary purpose of the --record-continue-no-player option is to allow users to continue recording to the file on disk even if the player program closes or crashes. This would provide users with more flexibility and control over their recording process.

Q: How would the --record-continue-no-player option work?

A: If the --record-continue-no-player option were implemented, it would work as follows:

The primary output would still be the stream to file.
The player would be a secondary consideration.
If the player program closes or crashes, the recording would continue to the file on disk.
The user would have the option to specify the output file and the format of the recording.

Q: Why is the --record-continue-no-player option necessary?

A: The --record-continue-no-player option is necessary because it would address the issue of the recording stopping when the player program closes or crashes. This can be frustrating for users who want to continue recording even if the player is no longer running.

Q: Would the --record-continue-no-player option be compatible with all players?

A: The --record-continue-no-player option would be designed to be compatible with all players, including those that are currently supported by Streamlink. However, it's possible that some players may not work correctly with this option, and users may need to adjust their settings accordingly.

Q: How would the --record-continue-no-player option affect the recording process?

A: The --record-continue-no-player option would affect the recording process by allowing users to continue recording to the file on disk even if the player program closes or crashes. This would provide users with more flexibility and control over their recording process.

Q: Would the --record-continue-no-player option be available in all versions of Streamlink?

A: The --record-continue-no-player option would be available in all versions of Streamlink, including the latest version and future versions.

Q: How can I provide feedback on the --record-continue-no-player option?

A: If you have any feedback on the --record-continue-no-player option, you can provide it by opening a pull request with a new feature implementation or by commenting on this issue. We appreciate any feedback that you can provide.

Q: When can I expect the --record-continue-no-player option to be implemented?

A: We can't provide an exact timeline for when the --record-continue-no-player option will be implemented. However, we're working hard to make this feature a reality, and we'll keep you updated on our progress.

Q: How can I help with the implementation of the --record-continue-no-player option?

A: If you're interested in helping with the implementation of the --record-continue-no-player option, you can contribute to the Streamlink project by opening a pull request with a new feature implementation or by commenting on this issue. We appreciate any help that you can provide.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the --record-continue-no-player option is a necessary feature that would provide users with more flexibility and control over their recording process. We hope that this feature will be implemented in the future and look forward to hearing from the Streamlink community on this matter.