Understanding Action State Extension Proofs

Oct 13, 2025 by miodeya.com 105 views

Introduction

In the context of blockchain technology, action state extension proofs play a crucial role in ensuring the integrity and security of the network. However, in certain situations, these proofs may not be required, and their verification can be skipped. In this article, we will discuss the issue of not skipping the verification of action state extension proofs when they are not required and propose a solution to address this problem.

Understanding Action State Extension Proofs

Action state extension proofs are used to verify the state of the action in a blockchain network. These proofs are essential in ensuring that the action is valid and has not been tampered with. However, in some cases, these proofs may not be required, such as when there are less than a certain number of actions. In such situations, the proof is set to a dummy value, but the verification in the circuit is not skipped.

The Problem

The current implementation of the action state extension proof verification does not skip the verification when the proof is set to a dummy value. This can lead to unnecessary computations and slow down the network. The issue arises from the fact that the verification is not conditional on the presence of a valid proof.

Proposed Solution

To address this issue, we propose adding a flag to the witness and passing it as the ~check argument in the following places:

src/app/zeko/circuits/rule_inner_sync.ml#L25
src/app/zeko/circuits/rule_commit.ml#L29
src/app/zeko/circuits/rule_commit.ml#L30

This flag will indicate whether the action state extension proof should be verified or not. If the flag is set to false, the verification will be skipped, and the circuit will proceed without checking the proof.

Benefits of the Proposed Solution

The proposed solution has several benefits, including:

Improved performance: By skipping the verification of action state extension proofs when they are not required, the network will experience improved performance and faster transaction processing times.
Reduced computational overhead: The proposed solution will reduce the computational overhead associated with verifying action state extension proofs, which will lead to a more efficient use of resources.
Enhanced security: The proposed solution will not compromise the security of the network, as the verification of action state extension proofs will still be performed when required.

Implementation Details

To implement the proposed solution, the following steps will be taken:

Add a flag to the witness: A new flag will be added to the witness to indicate whether the action state extension proof should be verified or not.
Pass the flag as the ~check argument: The flag will be passed as the ~check argument in the specified locations.
Modify the circuit logic: The circuit logic will be modified to skip the verification of action state extension proofs when the flag is set to false.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the proposed solution will address the issue of not skipping the verification of action state extension proofs when they are not required. By adding a flag to the witness and passing it as the ~check argument, the verification will be skipped, and the circuit will proceed without checking the proof. This solution will improve the performance and efficiency of the network, while maintaining the security and integrity of the blockchain.

Future Work

Future work will focus on further optimizing the circuit logic and improving the performance of the network. Additionally, the proposed solution will be tested and validated to ensure its correctness and effectiveness.

References

get_iterations
src/app/zeko/circuits/rule_inner_sync.ml#L25
src/app/zeko/circuits/rule_commit.ml#L29
src/app/zeko/circuits/rule_commit.ml#L30
Allow Skipping Verification of Action State Extension Proofs: Q&A ================================================================

Introduction

In our previous article, we discussed the issue of not skipping the verification of action state extension proofs when they are not required and proposed a solution to address this problem. In this article, we will provide a Q&A section to further clarify the proposed solution and its implementation.

Q: What is the purpose of action state extension proofs?

A: Action state extension proofs are used to verify the state of the action in a blockchain network. These proofs are essential in ensuring that the action is valid and has not been tampered with.

Q: Why is it necessary to skip the verification of action state extension proofs when they are not required?

A: Skipping the verification of action state extension proofs when they are not required can improve the performance and efficiency of the network. It can also reduce the computational overhead associated with verifying these proofs.

Q: How will the proposed solution improve the performance of the network?

A: The proposed solution will improve the performance of the network by skipping the verification of action state extension proofs when they are not required. This will reduce the computational overhead associated with verifying these proofs and allow the network to process transactions faster.

Q: What are the benefits of the proposed solution?

A: The proposed solution has several benefits, including:

Improved performance: By skipping the verification of action state extension proofs when they are not required, the network will experience improved performance and faster transaction processing times.
Reduced computational overhead: The proposed solution will reduce the computational overhead associated with verifying action state extension proofs, which will lead to a more efficient use of resources.
Enhanced security: The proposed solution will not compromise the security of the network, as the verification of action state extension proofs will still be performed when required.

Q: How will the proposed solution be implemented?

A: The proposed solution will be implemented by adding a flag to the witness and passing it as the ~check argument in the specified locations. The circuit logic will also be modified to skip the verification of action state extension proofs when the flag is set to false.

Q: What are the potential risks associated with the proposed solution?

A: The proposed solution does not compromise the security of the network, as the verification of action state extension proofs will still be performed when required. However, there is a small risk that the flag may be set to false incorrectly, which could lead to a security vulnerability.

Q: How will the proposed solution be tested and validated?

A: The proposed solution will be tested and validated through a series of tests and simulations. These tests will ensure that the solution works as intended and does not compromise the security of the network.

Q: What is the expected timeline for implementing the proposed solution?

A: The expected timeline for implementing the proposed solution is [insert timeline]. This timeline will depend on the complexity of the implementation and the resources available.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the proposed solution to skip the verification of action state extension proofs when they are not required has several benefits, including improved performance, reduced computational overhead, and enhanced security. The solution will be implemented by adding a flag to the witness and passing it as the ~check argument in the specified locations. The circuit logic will also be modified to skip the verification of action state extension proofs when the flag is set to false. The solution will be tested and validated through a series of tests and simulations to ensure that it works as intended and does not compromise the security of the network.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is the purpose of action state extension proofs? A: Action state extension proofs are used to verify the state of the action in a blockchain network.
Q: Why is it necessary to skip the verification of action state extension proofs when they are not required? A: Skipping the verification of action state extension proofs when they are not required can improve the performance and efficiency of the network.
Q: How will the proposed solution improve the performance of the network? A: The proposed solution will improve the performance of the network by skipping the verification of action state extension proofs when they are not required.

References

get_iterations
src/app/zeko/circuits/rule_inner_sync.ml#L25
src/app/zeko/circuits/rule_commit.ml#L29
src/app/zeko/circuits/rule_commit.ml#L30