Test the Effectiveness of Various Types of RPTT in Controlling Sprouts in Soybean Plants

Oct 13, 2025 by miodeya.com 139 views

Test the Effectiveness of Various Types of RPTT in Controlling Sprouts in Soybean Plants

Introduction

Sprouts caused by the mushroom of athelial rolfsii (Curzi) are a serious threat to soybean plants (Glycine max (L.) Merril). This fungus has mycelium that looks like a neatly arranged white thread, resembling cotton. The impact of this disease can be devastating, resulting in significant losses for soybean farmers. In recent years, researchers have been exploring alternative methods to control this disease, focusing on the use of beneficial microorganisms such as Rizobacteria for Plant Growth (RPTT). This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of five types of RPTT in suppressing the growth of A. rolfsii and to determine the most effective type of RPTT in controlling the pathogen.

Background

Soybean is one of the most widely cultivated crops in the world, and Indonesia is one of the largest producers of soybeans. However, the growth of soybean plants is often threatened by various diseases, including the fungal disease caused by A. rolfsii. This disease can cause significant losses in soybean yields, resulting in economic burdens for farmers. In recent years, researchers have been exploring alternative methods to control this disease, focusing on the use of beneficial microorganisms such as RPTT.

Methodology

This study was conducted at the Plant Disease Laboratory and in the greenhouse of the Faculty of Agriculture, University of North Sumatra, Medan from March to August 2017. A non-factory random design trial design with seven treatments repeated four times was used. The treatments tested included R0 (control), R1 (A. Rolfsii), R2 (A. Rolfsii + Aeromonas Hydrophila), R3 (A. Rolfsii + Burkholderia Cepacia), R4 (A. Rolfsii + Serratia Ficaria), R5 (A. Rolfsii + Pantoea spp. 2), and R6 (A. Rolfsii + Vibrio Alginolyticus).

Results

The results showed that the treatment of R1 (A. Rolfsii) had the highest percentage of disease severity of 50%, while the treatment of R3, R5, and R6 showed the severity of 0%, which indicated success in controlling pathogens. The results also showed that the application of PGPR such as Burkholderia Cepacia, Pantoea spp. 2, and Vibrio alginolyticus significantly decreases both the severity and the incidence of sprouts. This decrease indicates that these bacteria can function as effective biological control agents.

Analysis of Research Results

The results obtained show that the application of PGPR such as Burkholderia Cepacia, Pantoea spp. 2, and Vibrio alginolyticus significantly decreases both the severity and the incidence of sprouts. This decrease indicates that these bacteria can function as effective biological control agents. Furthermore, R3 recorded the highest root wet weight of 7.44 g, showing that the use of Burkholderia Cepacia not only controls pathogens but also encourages healthy root growth.

From the perspective of root growth, R2 with aeromonas hydrophila produces the highest root dry weight of 2.11 g. This shows that although R2 does not significantly reduce the severity of the disease, this bacterium has the potential as a good growth stimulant under certain conditions.

Conclusion

The conclusion of this study shows that the use of RPTT has a great potential in controlling sprouts in soybean plants. The use of PGPR such as Burkholderia Cepacia, Pantoea spp. 2, and Vibrio alginolyticus is not only effective in suppressing A. rolfsii, but also contributes to increased root growth. This indicates the importance of developing environmentally friendly biological-based disease control methods as an alternative to minimize the use of chemical pesticides in soybean cultivation. Further research is needed to understand the mechanism behind the effectiveness of this RPTT and its application in the field.

Recommendation

Based on the results of this study, it is recommended that further research be conducted to understand the mechanism behind the effectiveness of RPTT in controlling sprouts in soybean plants. Additionally, the use of PGPR such as Burkholderia Cepacia, Pantoea spp. 2, and Vibrio alginolyticus should be explored as a potential biological control agent for A. rolfsii. This could lead to the development of environmentally friendly disease control methods that minimize the use of chemical pesticides in soybean cultivation.

Future Research Directions

Future research should focus on understanding the mechanism behind the effectiveness of RPTT in controlling sprouts in soybean plants. This could involve studying the interactions between the PGPR and the fungal pathogen, as well as the effects of RPTT on plant growth and development. Additionally, further research should be conducted to explore the potential of RPTT as a biological control agent for other plant diseases.

Limitations of the Study

This study had several limitations. Firstly, the study was conducted in a controlled environment, which may not accurately reflect the conditions found in the field. Secondly, the study only tested a limited number of PGPR, and further research is needed to explore the potential of other beneficial microorganisms. Finally, the study only focused on the use of RPTT in controlling sprouts in soybean plants, and further research is needed to explore the potential of RPTT in controlling other plant diseases.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study demonstrates the potential of RPTT in controlling sprouts in soybean plants. The use of PGPR such as Burkholderia Cepacia, Pantoea spp. 2, and Vibrio alginolyticus is not only effective in suppressing A. rolfsii, but also contributes to increased root growth. This indicates the importance of developing environmentally friendly biological-based disease control methods as an alternative to minimize the use of chemical pesticides in soybean cultivation. Further research is needed to understand the mechanism behind the effectiveness of this RPTT and its application in the field.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about RPTT and its Effectiveness in Controlling Sprouts in Soybean Plants

Q: What is RPTT and how does it work?

A: RPTT stands for Rizobacteria for Plant Growth, which refers to the use of beneficial microorganisms such as bacteria to promote plant growth and health. RPTT works by introducing these beneficial microorganisms into the soil or plant system, where they can colonize and interact with the plant, promoting healthy growth and development.

Q: What are the benefits of using RPTT in controlling sprouts in soybean plants?

A: The benefits of using RPTT in controlling sprouts in soybean plants include:

Reduced severity and incidence of sprouts
Increased root growth and development
Improved plant health and resilience
Reduced need for chemical pesticides
Environmentally friendly and sustainable approach

Q: Which types of RPTT were tested in this study?

A: The study tested five types of RPTT, including:

R0 (control)
R1 (A. Rolfsii)
R2 (A. Rolfsii + Aeromonas Hydrophila)
R3 (A. Rolfsii + Burkholderia Cepacia)
R4 (A. Rolfsii + Serratia Ficaria)
R5 (A. Rolfsii + Pantoea spp. 2)
R6 (A. Rolfsii + Vibrio Alginolyticus)

Q: Which type of RPTT was most effective in controlling sprouts in soybean plants?

A: The study found that R3 (A. Rolfsii + Burkholderia Cepacia) was the most effective type of RPTT in controlling sprouts in soybean plants, with a severity of 0% and a significant increase in root growth.

Q: How does RPTT interact with the fungal pathogen A. rolfsii?

A: The study found that the beneficial microorganisms used in RPTT, such as Burkholderia Cepacia, Pantoea spp. 2, and Vibrio alginolyticus, can interact with the fungal pathogen A. rolfsii in a way that suppresses its growth and development.

Q: Can RPTT be used to control other plant diseases?

A: Yes, RPTT has the potential to be used to control other plant diseases, including those caused by bacteria, fungi, and viruses. Further research is needed to explore the potential of RPTT in controlling other plant diseases.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: The study had several limitations, including:

The study was conducted in a controlled environment, which may not accurately reflect the conditions found in the field.
The study only tested a limited number of PGPR, and further research is needed to explore the potential of other beneficial microorganisms.
The study only focused on the use of RPTT in controlling sprouts in soybean plants, and further research is needed to explore the potential of RPTT in controlling other plant diseases.

Q: What are the future research directions for RPTT?

A: Future research should focus on understanding the mechanism behind the effectiveness of RPTT in controlling sprouts in soybean plants, as well as exploring the potential of RPTT in controlling other plant diseases. Additionally, further research should be conducted to explore the potential of RPTT as a biological control agent for other plant diseases.

Q: How can RPTT be applied in the field?

A: RPTT can be applied in the field through various methods, including:

Seed treatment: Seeds can be treated with beneficial microorganisms before planting.
Soil treatment: Beneficial microorganisms can be applied to the soil to promote healthy growth and development.
Foliar spray: Beneficial microorganisms can be applied to the leaves of plants to promote healthy growth and development.

Q: What are the potential benefits of using RPTT in agriculture?

A: The potential benefits of using RPTT in agriculture include:

Reduced need for chemical pesticides
Improved plant health and resilience
Increased crop yields
Improved soil health
Reduced environmental impact

Q: What are the potential challenges of using RPTT in agriculture?

A: The potential challenges of using RPTT in agriculture include:

Limited understanding of the mechanism behind the effectiveness of RPTT
Limited availability of beneficial microorganisms
Limited knowledge of the optimal application methods for RPTT
Potential for contamination or spoilage of beneficial microorganisms.