Strengthening Social Capital

Oct 13, 2025 by miodeya.com 35 views

Socio-Economic Adaptation Patterns of the People of Suka Meriah Village after the Natural Disaster of the Eruption of Mount Sinabung

Introduction

Natural disasters are phenomena that cannot be avoided by humans and can have a significant impact on social and economic life. In Suka Meriah Village, Payung District, Karo Regency, the community experienced a major disaster during the eruption of Mount Sinabung on August 18, 2010. The eruption of this mountain caused widespread panic, forcing residents to evacuate to Kabanjahe and Brastagi. During the two months of refuge, all economic activity was stopped, resulting in crop failure and paralysis of the citizen economy sector. When they return to their hometowns, they must start life from scratch, without savings or income, which causes daily needs to be very difficult to meet.

Background of the Study

The eruption of Mount Sinabung on August 18, 2010, was a significant event that affected the lives of the people of Suka Meriah Village. The disaster caused widespread panic, displacement, and economic loss. The community was forced to evacuate to nearby towns, leaving behind their homes, livelihoods, and economic activities. The two-month period of refuge resulted in crop failure, economic paralysis, and a significant impact on the social and economic life of the community.

Methodology

This study uses a qualitative method with a descriptive approach to describe the socioeconomic patterns of the people of Suka Meriah Village, Post-Disaster. Through observations and interviews, it was found that the village community carried out various patterns of adaptation to survive. The study aimed to identify the socioeconomic adaptation patterns of the people of Suka Meriah Village and to understand the factors that influenced their ability to adapt to the disaster.

Socioeconomic Adaptation Patterns

The study found that the people of Suka Meriah Village carried out various patterns of adaptation to survive. One of the key patterns was maintaining good social relations between fellow citizens and families. This social relationship became an important asset, allowing them to help each other in difficult conditions, such as borrowing money or sharing their skills.

Social Adaptation Patterns

The strong pattern of social adaptation shows how important the community is in dealing with difficulties. The community likes to be festive, which shows extraordinary resilience by building a solid social network before the disaster occurs. This network provides social capital that can be utilized when urgent conditions, such as when they have to overcome the economic crisis due to disasters.

Economic Adaptation Patterns

On the economic side, residents like to optimize existing resources by becoming a freelance daily worker (BHL) and re-processing their natural environment. They learn to take advantage of all existing energy and innovate in producing the goods and services needed. This lifestyle shows creativity and high fighting power. Residents must "hold something that does not exist", meaning they must try hard to meet daily needs even in conditions of lack.

Factors Influencing Adaptation

Further analysis of this adaptation pattern shows that the ability to adapt not only depends on the existence of physical resources, but also on the power of social relations and individual skills. People who have strong social ties tend to recover faster than disasters, because they can support each other in various aspects, including financial, emotional, and skills.

Conclusion

From this study, it is clear that the pattern of socioeconomic adaptation applied by the people of Suka Meriah Village is very complex and interrelated. Their ability to adapt is proof that in a state of crisis, community strength and individual innovation have an important role in the recovery process. Thus, the government and related institutions need to strengthen support to build the social and economic capacity of the post-disaster community, so that they can be better prepared to face challenges in the future.

Recommendations

Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are made:

Strengthening Social Capital: The government and related institutions should strengthen support to build the social capital of the post-disaster community. This can be done by promoting community-based initiatives, social programs, and economic activities that foster social relationships and cooperation.
Economic Empowerment: The government and related institutions should provide economic empowerment programs to support the people of Suka Meriah Village in rebuilding their livelihoods and economic activities. This can be done by providing training, skills development, and access to credit and other financial resources.
Community-Based Initiatives: The government and related institutions should support community-based initiatives that promote social and economic development in the post-disaster community. This can be done by providing funding, technical assistance, and other forms of support to community-led initiatives.

Limitations of the Study

This study has several limitations that should be noted. Firstly, the study was conducted in a specific context, namely the people of Suka Meriah Village, and may not be generalizable to other communities. Secondly, the study relied on qualitative data collection methods, which may not provide a comprehensive understanding of the socioeconomic adaptation patterns of the community. Finally, the study was limited to a specific time frame, namely the post-disaster period, and may not capture the long-term effects of the disaster on the community.

Future Research Directions

Future research should aim to build on the findings of this study by exploring the following research directions:

Comparative Study: A comparative study of the socioeconomic adaptation patterns of different communities affected by natural disasters can provide valuable insights into the factors that influence adaptation and recovery.
Long-Term Effects: A study of the long-term effects of the disaster on the community can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of the disaster on the social and economic life of the community.
Policy Implications: A study of the policy implications of the findings of this study can provide valuable insights into the role of government and related institutions in supporting the recovery and development of post-disaster communities.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Socioeconomic Adaptation Patterns of the People of Suka Meriah Village after the Natural Disaster of the Eruption of Mount Sinabung

Q: What was the impact of the eruption of Mount Sinabung on the people of Suka Meriah Village?

A: The eruption of Mount Sinabung on August 18, 2010, caused widespread panic, displacement, and economic loss. The community was forced to evacuate to nearby towns, leaving behind their homes, livelihoods, and economic activities.

Q: What were the socioeconomic adaptation patterns of the people of Suka Meriah Village after the disaster?

A: The study found that the people of Suka Meriah Village carried out various patterns of adaptation to survive. One of the key patterns was maintaining good social relations between fellow citizens and families. This social relationship became an important asset, allowing them to help each other in difficult conditions, such as borrowing money or sharing their skills.

Q: What was the role of social capital in the socioeconomic adaptation patterns of the people of Suka Meriah Village?

A: The study found that social capital played a crucial role in the socioeconomic adaptation patterns of the people of Suka Meriah Village. The community's strong social ties allowed them to support each other in various aspects, including financial, emotional, and skills.

Q: How did the people of Suka Meriah Village optimize their existing resources to adapt to the disaster?

A: The study found that the people of Suka Meriah Village optimized their existing resources by becoming freelance daily workers (BHL) and re-processing their natural environment. They learned to take advantage of all existing energy and innovate in producing the goods and services needed.

Q: What was the significance of the community's ability to adapt to the disaster?

A: The study found that the community's ability to adapt to the disaster was a testament to their resilience and ability to innovate in the face of adversity. The community's ability to adapt was also a result of their strong social ties and social capital.

Q: What are the implications of the study's findings for policymakers and practitioners?

A: The study's findings have important implications for policymakers and practitioners. They highlight the need for policymakers and practitioners to support community-based initiatives and social programs that foster social relationships and cooperation. They also highlight the need for policymakers and practitioners to provide economic empowerment programs to support the recovery and development of post-disaster communities.

Q: What are the limitations of the study?

A: The study has several limitations that should be noted. Firstly, the study was conducted in a specific context, namely the people of Suka Meriah Village, and may not be generalizable to other communities. Secondly, the study relied on qualitative data collection methods, which may not provide a comprehensive understanding of the socioeconomic adaptation patterns of the community. Finally, the study was limited to a specific time frame, namely the post-disaster period, and may not capture the long-term effects of the disaster on the community.

Q: What are the future research directions?

A: Future research should aim to build on the findings of this study by exploring the following research directions:

Comparative Study: A comparative study of the socioeconomic adaptation patterns of different communities affected by natural disasters can provide valuable insights into the factors that influence adaptation and recovery.
Long-Term Effects: A study of the long-term effects of the disaster on the community can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of the disaster on the social and economic life of the community.
Policy Implications: A study of the policy implications of the findings of this study can provide valuable insights into the role of government and related institutions in supporting the recovery and development of post-disaster communities.

Q: What are the recommendations for policymakers and practitioners?

A: Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are made:

Strengthening Social Capital: Policymakers and practitioners should strengthen support to build the social capital of post-disaster communities.
Economic Empowerment: Policymakers and practitioners should provide economic empowerment programs to support the recovery and development of post-disaster communities.
Community-Based Initiatives: Policymakers and practitioners should support community-based initiatives that promote social and economic development in post-disaster communities.