Media outlets should strive for objectivity and neutrality in reporting

Oct 13, 2025 by miodeya.com 83 views

Analysis of the Framing of the Democratic Party Kudeta News in Kompas.com: Building Sympathy and Agenda Settings

Introduction

In today's digital age, the way news is presented and consumed has undergone a significant transformation. With the rise of online media, news outlets have become more accessible and widespread, allowing readers to access a vast array of information at their fingertips. However, this increased accessibility has also led to concerns about the potential for biased reporting and the manipulation of public opinion. This is particularly relevant in the context of Indonesia, where the media plays a crucial role in shaping public perceptions and influencing electoral outcomes.

The Importance of Framing Analysis

Framing analysis is a critical tool for understanding how news is constructed and presented to the public. By examining the language, symbols, and narratives used in news reporting, researchers can gain insight into the ways in which media outlets shape public opinion and influence reader perceptions. In the context of this study, framing analysis is used to examine how Kompas.com, one of Indonesia's leading online news outlets, framed news about the Democratic Party coup.

The Democratic Party Coup: A Complex and Controversial Issue

The Democratic Party coup, led by Moeldoko, was a highly contentious and complex issue that sparked widespread debate and discussion in Indonesia. The coup was seen as a challenge to the leadership of the Democratic Party, and its implications for the party's future and the country's politics were far-reaching. Given the complexity and sensitivity of this issue, it is essential to examine how Kompas.com framed the news and presented it to the public.

Framing Analysis of Kompas.com's Reporting

This study found that Kompas.com tended to build a sympathetic framing of the Democratic Party, especially the Agus Harimurti Yudhoyono (AHY) camp, on the coup conducted by Moeldoko. This framing was evident in several ways:

*** The Selection of Speakers: ** Kompas.com displayed more statements from the AHY camp compared to the Moeldoko camp, giving the impression that AHY had stronger and more credible support.

*** Reality Symbols and Construction: ** The use of certain symbols, such as the younger and energetic image of AHY, as well as more senior and experienced Moeldoko, created a reality construction that described AHY as a victim and Moeldoko as a coup.

*** Agenda Setting: ** News Placement about Democratic Party coup on the main page or at the top of the Kompas.com site showed that this media considered the issue to be important and deserved public attention.

The Influence of Framing on Reader Perception

This framing had a strong influence on the reader's perception. Readers tended to be more confident in the narrative built by Kompas.com and sympathized with AHY. This is a critical concern, as it highlights the potential for media outlets to shape public opinion and influence reader perceptions through the selective presentation of information.

Deeper Analysis: Theoretical Perspectives

Several theoretical perspectives can be applied to understand the findings of this study. One of the most relevant is the framing theory of William A. Gamson, which argues that media framing can affect the reader's perception by highlighting certain aspects of an issue and ignoring other aspects. In this case, Kompas.com chose to highlight the aspects that support AHY and ignore the aspects that support Moeldoko.

Another relevant perspective is the concept of media alignments, which suggests that media outlets can take sides in reporting and present information in a way that supports one perspective over another. This analysis shows that Kompas.com has a tendency to side with AHY in the reporting of the Democratic Party coup, which raises concerns about the objectivity and neutrality of the media.

Finally, the framing built by Kompas.com can be seen as an effort to form public opinion and support AHY in the electoral political context. This highlights the potential for media outlets to influence electoral outcomes through the selective presentation of information.

Conclusion

Analysis of the Democratic Party coup framing in Kompas.com shows that this online media plays an important role in forming public perceptions through the selection of certain narratives and symbols. It is essential for readers to be critical of the information presented by the media and always look for other sources of information to get a more complete perspective. By examining the ways in which media outlets frame news and present information, researchers can gain insight into the complex dynamics of public opinion and the potential for media manipulation.

Recommendations

Based on the findings of this study, several recommendations can be made:

Media outlets should strive for objectivity and neutrality in reporting: Media outlets should aim to present a balanced and impartial view of the news, avoiding the selective presentation of information that can influence reader perceptions.
Readers should be critical of the information presented by the media: Readers should be aware of the potential for media manipulation and take steps to verify the accuracy of the information presented.
Media literacy education should be promoted: Media literacy education can help readers develop the skills and knowledge needed to critically evaluate the information presented by the media.

By following these recommendations, readers can become more informed and engaged citizens, and media outlets can play a more constructive role in shaping public opinion and influencing electoral outcomes.
Frequently Asked Questions: The Framing of the Democratic Party Kudeta News in Kompas.com

Q: What is framing analysis, and how is it used in this study?

A: Framing analysis is a critical tool for understanding how news is constructed and presented to the public. It involves examining the language, symbols, and narratives used in news reporting to gain insight into the ways in which media outlets shape public opinion and influence reader perceptions. In this study, framing analysis is used to examine how Kompas.com framed news about the Democratic Party coup.

Q: What were the main findings of this study?

A: The study found that Kompas.com tended to build a sympathetic framing of the Democratic Party, especially the Agus Harimurti Yudhoyono (AHY) camp, on the coup conducted by Moeldoko. This framing was evident in several ways, including the selection of speakers, reality symbols and construction, and agenda setting.

Q: What is the significance of the selection of speakers in this study?

A: The selection of speakers refers to the way in which Kompas.com chose to present statements from different individuals involved in the coup. The study found that Kompas.com displayed more statements from the AHY camp compared to the Moeldoko camp, giving the impression that AHY had stronger and more credible support.

Q: What is the concept of reality symbols and construction, and how is it relevant to this study?

A: Reality symbols and construction refer to the way in which media outlets use certain symbols and narratives to create a particular reality or perception of an issue. In this study, the use of certain symbols, such as the younger and energetic image of AHY, as well as more senior and experienced Moeldoko, created a reality construction that described AHY as a victim and Moeldoko as a coup.

Q: What is agenda setting, and how is it relevant to this study?

A: Agenda setting refers to the way in which media outlets decide what issues to cover and how to present them to the public. In this study, the placement of news about the Democratic Party coup on the main page or at the top of the Kompas.com site showed that this media considered the issue to be important and deserved public attention.

Q: What are the implications of this study for media outlets and readers?

A: The study highlights the potential for media outlets to shape public opinion and influence reader perceptions through the selective presentation of information. It also emphasizes the importance of readers being critical of the information presented by the media and seeking out multiple sources of information to get a more complete perspective.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: This study has several limitations, including the focus on a single media outlet and the use of a specific case study. Future research could build on this study by examining the framing of news in other media outlets and using a more comprehensive approach to analyze the construction of reality.

Q: What are the recommendations for media outlets and readers based on this study?

A: Based on the findings of this study, several recommendations can be made:

Media outlets should strive for objectivity and neutrality in reporting: Media outlets should aim to present a balanced and impartial view of the news, avoiding the selective presentation of information that can influence reader perceptions.
Readers should be critical of the information presented by the media: Readers should be aware of the potential for media manipulation and take steps to verify the accuracy of the information presented.
Media literacy education should be promoted: Media literacy education can help readers develop the skills and knowledge needed to critically evaluate the information presented by the media.