Identification of the Problem

Oct 13, 2025 by miodeya.com 44 views

The News of the Israeli and Hamas Conflict: A Framing Analysis Study on the Republika Newspaper

Introduction

The Israeli-Hamas conflict that erupted in January 2009 has become a major global issue, with widespread media coverage and public attention. In Indonesia, the Republika newspaper, as a prominent mass media outlet, has played a significant role in conveying information related to the conflict. This study aims to analyze how the Israeli-Hamas conflict news framing in the Republika newspaper, particularly during January 2009, was presented using the Robert Entman version of the framing model.

Methodology

This study employed a media content analysis method, focusing on ten news articles published in the Republika newspaper during January 2009. The data obtained was then analyzed based on four elements of framing, as proposed by Entman:

Identification of the Problem: How does the Republika newspaper define the Israeli-Hamas conflict as a problem?
Diagnosis of the Cause: What causes the conflict identified by the media?
Moral Assessment: What moral judgments are made about the conflict?
Recommendations for Solutions: What solutions are offered by the media to resolve conflicts?

Framing Analysis

The framing analysis reveals that the Republika newspaper, as a medium with an Islamic ideology base, tends to highlight the human side and suffering of the Palestinian people due to the conflict. News framing in Republika emphasizes Israel as the party responsible for the conflict, as well as questioning the legitimacy of Israeli military actions in Gaza.

In Identification of Problems, Republika puts forward human rights violations and the suffering of the Palestinian people as a direct impact of Israeli attacks. The Diagnosis of the Cause emphasizes Israeli aggressive actions and Zionist policies that are considered unfair. In Moral Assessment, Republika places Israel as parties who violate international law and carry out brutal actions, while Palestine is positioned as a victim who struggles to maintain its rights.

Finally, Recommendations for Solutions offered by Republika emphasize the importance of peace and solutions between the two countries. This media also calls on the international world to play an active role in stopping Israel's aggression and putting pressure on Israel to resolve conflicts peacefully.

Conclusion

This framing analysis shows that the Republika newspaper, despite having a certain ideological base, is trying to construct the news of the Israeli-Hamas conflict in a balanced manner and present various perspectives. However, the ideological orientation of the media is still seen in news framing, which tends to place Palestine as victims and Israel as the party responsible for the conflict.

Limitations and Future Research Directions

It is essential to note that this analysis only focuses on a specific time period. To gain a more comprehensive understanding, further research should be conducted, including a broader period of time and a variety of media outlets. This would provide a more nuanced understanding of how different media outlets frame the Israeli-Hamas conflict and how these frames may change over time.

Implications for Media Studies and International Relations

This study has implications for media studies and international relations. It highlights the importance of considering the ideological orientation of media outlets when analyzing news framing. It also underscores the need for media outlets to present balanced and nuanced perspectives on complex conflicts like the Israeli-Hamas conflict.

Recommendations for Media Practitioners

Media practitioners should strive to present balanced and nuanced perspectives on complex conflicts. This can be achieved by:

Providing multiple sources and perspectives on the conflict
Avoiding emotive language and sensationalism
Focusing on the human impact of the conflict
Encouraging critical thinking and debate

By following these recommendations, media practitioners can help to promote a more informed and nuanced public discourse on complex conflicts like the Israeli-Hamas conflict.

References

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1-37.
Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. Sage Publications.

Appendix

The appendix includes the list of news articles analyzed in this study, as well as the coding scheme used to analyze the data.
Frequently Asked Questions: The Israeli-Hamas Conflict and Media Framing

Q: What is the Israeli-Hamas conflict?

A: The Israeli-Hamas conflict is a longstanding dispute between Israel and the Palestinian Islamist group Hamas, which has been ongoing since the early 2000s. The conflict has resulted in numerous wars, including the 2008-2009 Gaza War and the 2014 Gaza War.

Q: What is media framing, and how does it relate to the Israeli-Hamas conflict?

A: Media framing refers to the way in which news outlets present information about a particular issue or event. In the context of the Israeli-Hamas conflict, media framing can influence how the public perceives the conflict and its various parties. This study analyzed how the Republika newspaper framed the Israeli-Hamas conflict in January 2009.

Q: What were the main findings of the study?

A: The study found that the Republika newspaper framed the Israeli-Hamas conflict in a way that emphasized the human suffering of the Palestinian people and portrayed Israel as the party responsible for the conflict. The newspaper also highlighted the need for peace and solutions between the two countries.

Q: What are the implications of the study's findings?

A: The study's findings suggest that media framing can have a significant impact on how the public perceives complex conflicts like the Israeli-Hamas conflict. By presenting a balanced and nuanced perspective, media outlets can help to promote a more informed and nuanced public discourse.

Q: What are some potential limitations of the study?

A: The study only analyzed news articles from the Republika newspaper during a specific time period (January 2009). Future research should consider a broader period of time and a variety of media outlets to gain a more comprehensive understanding of how different media outlets frame the Israeli-Hamas conflict.

Q: What are some recommendations for media practitioners?

A: Media practitioners should strive to present balanced and nuanced perspectives on complex conflicts. This can be achieved by:

Providing multiple sources and perspectives on the conflict
Avoiding emotive language and sensationalism
Focusing on the human impact of the conflict
Encouraging critical thinking and debate

Q: What are some potential implications for international relations?

A: The study's findings suggest that media framing can have a significant impact on how different countries perceive each other and their conflicts. By promoting a more nuanced and balanced perspective, media outlets can help to reduce tensions and promote peace.

Q: What are some potential implications for media studies?

A: The study's findings highlight the importance of considering the ideological orientation of media outlets when analyzing news framing. This study demonstrates the need for media studies to consider the complex and multifaceted nature of media framing.

Q: What are some potential future research directions?

A: Future research should consider a broader period of time and a variety of media outlets to gain a more comprehensive understanding of how different media outlets frame the Israeli-Hamas conflict. Additionally, researchers should explore the impact of media framing on public opinion and international relations.

Q: What are some potential applications of the study's findings?

A: The study's findings can be applied in a variety of contexts, including:

Media training and education
International relations and diplomacy
Conflict resolution and peacebuilding
Public opinion research and polling

By considering the complex and multifaceted nature of media framing, researchers and practitioners can work together to promote a more informed and nuanced public discourse on complex conflicts like the Israeli-Hamas conflict.