Higher Gaharu Selling Value

Oct 13, 2025 by miodeya.com 104 views

Introduction

Community Forests have been gaining attention in recent years due to their potential in providing wood and non-wood forest products. In Jaharun Village, Galang District, Deli Serdang Regency, community forests have been established with the aim of generating income and preserving the forest environment. This study aims to compare the financial feasibility of two community forest business models: Monoculture community forest with rubber plants (Hevea Brasiliensis) and Mixed community forest with agarwood plants (Aquilaria malaccensis) as the main crop.

Background

Community Forest is defined as a forest that grows on community-owned land with a minimum of 0.25 hectares and the dominance of wooden plants (more than 50%). This type of forest has great potential in providing wood and non-wood forest products, which can be a source of income for the community. However, the choice of crop and business model can significantly impact the financial feasibility of the community forest.

Research Methodology

This study uses descriptive analysis, financial analysis (NPV, BCR, IRR), and sensitivity analysis with a cost change of 5% and a profit of 5%. The data was collected from the community forest in Jaharun Village, Galang District, Deli Serdang Regency, and analyzed using financial software.

Results

The results of this study show that both Monoculture community forest business with rubber plants and Mixed community forest business with agarwood plants are financially worthy. However, the Mixed community forest business with agarwood as the main crop has proven to be more financially profitable than the rubber monoculture community forest business.

NPV (Net Present Value)

The NPV of the Mixed community forest business is Rp. 395,874,996,631, which is far higher than the Monoculture community forest business with NPV of Rp. 142.137.072,308. This indicates that the Mixed community forest business has a higher potential in generating profits.

BCR (Benefit Cost Ratio)

The value of BCR in the Monoculture Community Forest Business is 2.82, while the value of BCR in mixed community forest businesses reaches 3.91. The higher the BCR value, the better the rate of return of investment. This indicates that the Mixed community forest business has a higher rate of return of investment compared to the Monoculture community forest business.

IRR (Internal Rate of Returns)

IRR in mixed community forest business reached 34.2%, while IRR in the Monoculture Community Forest Business was 48.1%. IRR shows the level of profit that can be generated from investment. This indicates that the Mixed community forest business has a higher potential in generating profits compared to the Monoculture community forest business.

Further Analysis

The results of this study provide evidence that the Mixed Community Forest Business Model with agarwood plants has a higher potential in generating profits. This can be associated with several factors, including:

Higher Gaharu Selling Value

Gaharu has a high selling value on the market, both for the needs of the perfume industry, treatment, and various other purposes. This high selling value can contribute to the higher profits generated by the Mixed community forest business.

Agroforestry System

Mixed community forest models create more sustainable agroforestry systems, reduce the risk of crop failure, and increase biodiversity. This can contribute to the higher profits generated by the Mixed community forest business.

More Diverse Economic Benefits

Mixed community forests produce various products, not only wood, so as to provide more diverse economic opportunities for the community. This can contribute to the higher profits generated by the Mixed community forest business.

Conclusion

This study provides recommendations for the community to consider the model of mixed community forest business with agarwood as a more profitable and sustainable alternative. This model can help increase community income and preserve the forest environment. The results of this study can be used as a reference for policymakers and community leaders to develop more effective community forest management strategies.

Recommendations

Based on the results of this study, the following recommendations are made:

The community should consider the model of mixed community forest business with agarwood as a more profitable and sustainable alternative.
The community should invest in the development of agarwood plantations to increase the potential for higher profits.
The community should implement sustainable agroforestry systems to reduce the risk of crop failure and increase biodiversity.
The community should diversify their economic benefits by producing various products, not only wood.

Limitations

This study has several limitations, including:

The study was conducted in a specific location, and the results may not be generalizable to other locations.
The study only considered two community forest business models, and other models may have different financial feasibility.
The study did not consider the social and environmental impacts of the community forest business.

Future Research Directions

Future research should focus on:

Conducting a more comprehensive analysis of the financial feasibility of community forest business models.
Investigating the social and environmental impacts of community forest business.
Developing more effective community forest management strategies.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study provides evidence that the Mixed Community Forest Business Model with agarwood plants has a higher potential in generating profits compared to the Monoculture community forest business. The results of this study can be used as a reference for policymakers and community leaders to develop more effective community forest management strategies.

Introduction

In our previous article, we discussed the financial analysis comparison of Monoculture community forest business with Mixed community forest business in Jaharun Village, Galang District, Deli Serdang Regency. In this article, we will answer some of the frequently asked questions related to this topic.

Q: What is the main difference between Monoculture community forest business and Mixed community forest business?

A: The main difference between Monoculture community forest business and Mixed community forest business is the type of crop planted. Monoculture community forest business involves planting a single crop, such as rubber plants, while Mixed community forest business involves planting multiple crops, such as agarwood plants, in the same forest.

Q: Why is Mixed community forest business more profitable than Monoculture community forest business?

A: Mixed community forest business is more profitable than Monoculture community forest business because it has a higher potential for generating profits. This is due to the higher selling value of agarwood plants, the creation of more sustainable agroforestry systems, and the production of various products, not only wood.

Q: What are the benefits of Mixed community forest business?

A: The benefits of Mixed community forest business include:

Higher profits due to the higher selling value of agarwood plants
Creation of more sustainable agroforestry systems
Production of various products, not only wood
Increased biodiversity
Reduced risk of crop failure

Q: What are the challenges of implementing Mixed community forest business?

A: The challenges of implementing Mixed community forest business include:

Higher initial investment costs
Higher management costs due to the complexity of the agroforestry system
Higher risk of crop failure due to the diversity of crops
Higher risk of pests and diseases due to the diversity of crops

Q: How can policymakers and community leaders support the implementation of Mixed community forest business?

A: Policymakers and community leaders can support the implementation of Mixed community forest business by:

Providing financial support for the initial investment costs
Providing technical support for the management of the agroforestry system
Providing training and capacity building for community members on sustainable forest management practices
Providing market access for the products of the Mixed community forest business

Q: What are the future prospects of Mixed community forest business?

A: The future prospects of Mixed community forest business are promising due to the increasing demand for sustainable forest products and the potential for increased profits. However, the success of Mixed community forest business depends on the effective management of the agroforestry system and the ability of community members to adapt to changing market conditions.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Mixed community forest business has a higher potential for generating profits compared to Monoculture community forest business. However, it also has higher initial investment costs and management costs. Policymakers and community leaders can support the implementation of Mixed community forest business by providing financial, technical, and market support. The future prospects of Mixed community forest business are promising, but it depends on the effective management of the agroforestry system and the ability of community members to adapt to changing market conditions.

Recommendations

Based on the Q&A session, the following recommendations are made:

Community members should consider the model of Mixed community forest business as a more profitable and sustainable alternative.
Policymakers and community leaders should provide financial, technical, and market support for the implementation of Mixed community forest business.
Community members should receive training and capacity building on sustainable forest management practices.
Community members should adapt to changing market conditions and be prepared to adjust their management practices accordingly.

Limitations

This Q&A session has several limitations, including:

The questions and answers are based on the assumption that the reader has a basic understanding of the topic.
The answers are based on the results of the study and may not be applicable to other locations or contexts.
The Q&A session does not provide a comprehensive analysis of the topic.

Future Research Directions

Future research should focus on:

Conducting a more comprehensive analysis of the financial feasibility of Mixed community forest business.
Investigating the social and environmental impacts of Mixed community forest business.
Developing more effective community forest management strategies.