Criminal Legal Aspects of Authentic Deed which contain false statements

Oct 13, 2025 by miodeya.com 144 views

Juridical Analysis of the Notary who Committed a Criminal Offense of Forgery of Information in the Authentic Deed (Case Study of the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1099/K/Pid.B/2010)

The Importance of Notary Position in Society

The presence of a notary position in society is very important and regulated by laws and regulations. Notaries play a crucial role in providing authentic written evidence related to events or legal actions involving parties present. However, in practice, it is not uncommon for a notary to be called by the law enforcement as a suspect due to the authentic deed they made. This raises the need to understand juridical analysis of criminal acts of forgery of information committed by the notary. The notary's responsibility is not only to create authentic deeds but also to ensure the truth of the information contained in them.

Legal Basis and Falsification of Information in Authentic Deed

The notary deed has a valid proof power according to the law, and is recognized as evidence that has a perfect value. This perfection value is supported by statements made in the notary deed. However, it is essential to note that the notary does not guarantee the truth of what is expressed by the parties facing. In this context, there are several important issues that need to be analyzed:

1. Criminal Legal Aspects of Authentic Deed which contain false statements

Criminal Acts of Falsification Information in the Authentic Deed is regulated in Article 266 of the Criminal Code. The elements that are characteristic of this criminal offense must be identified to understand what is meant by false information and how this can have an impact on the legal position of the notary. The notary's actions can have severe consequences if they are found to have committed forgery of information in the authentic deed.

2. Category of Notary Action

Notary actions that can be categorized as placing false information in authentic deeds can cover various aspects, including the offense of counterfeiting and identification of falsification in the deed. This is important to provide a clear picture of the legal consequences of these actions. The notary's actions must be in accordance with the law, and any deviation from this can lead to severe consequences.

3. Decision and Its Implications

The decision shows that if the notary is involved in entering false information, they can be subject to appropriate criminal sanctions. The notary's actions must be transparent and honest, and any attempt to deceive or mislead can lead to severe consequences.

Recommendations for Law Improvement

Based on the analysis conducted, there are several important recommendations that can be proposed. First, the government needs to revise the Notary Position Law (UUJN) by adding provisions that specifically regulate the criminal offense of information for authentic deeds. This will provide legal certainty and better protection for all parties involved. The law must be clear and concise, and any ambiguity can lead to confusion and misinterpretation.

Second, it is essential to regulate the position of the notary after committing a crime. This includes the need for education and increasing understanding of the application of criminal sanctions that can be imposed on notaries, so they are aware of the legal consequences of their actions. The notary's actions must be in accordance with the law, and any deviation from this can lead to severe consequences.

Conclusion

By understanding the juridical analysis of the notary who committed a criminal offense of information in the authentic deed, we can conclude that the notary has a very large responsibility in ensuring the truth of the information contained in the deed they made. The action of forgery of information not only harms the transactions but can also plunge the notary into the bondage of the law. Therefore, it is essential to enforce the law and revise the existing regulations to prevent the recurrence of similar cases in the future. The notary's actions must be transparent and honest, and any attempt to deceive or mislead can lead to severe consequences.

Future Directions

The analysis conducted in this study highlights the importance of revising the Notary Position Law (UUJN) to include provisions that specifically regulate the criminal offense of information for authentic deeds. Additionally, the need for education and increasing understanding of the application of criminal sanctions that can be imposed on notaries is essential. The law must be clear and concise, and any ambiguity can lead to confusion and misinterpretation.

Limitations of the Study

This study has several limitations. First, the analysis is based on a single case study, which may not be representative of all cases of forgery of information in authentic deeds. Second, the study only focuses on the legal aspects of the case and does not consider the social and economic implications. The study's limitations must be acknowledged, and future research can build upon this study to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the issue.

Recommendations for Future Research

Future research can build upon this study by exploring the social and economic implications of forgery of information in authentic deeds. Additionally, a more comprehensive analysis of the legal aspects of the case can be conducted by considering multiple case studies. The study's limitations must be acknowledged, and future research can build upon this study to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the issue.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the juridical analysis of the notary who committed a criminal offense of information in the authentic deed highlights the importance of revising the Notary Position Law (UUJN) to include provisions that specifically regulate the criminal offense of information for authentic deeds. Additionally, the need for education and increasing understanding of the application of criminal sanctions that can be imposed on notaries is essential. The law must be clear and concise, and any ambiguity can lead to confusion and misinterpretation.

References

[1] Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. (2010). Decision Number 1099/K/Pid.B/2010.
[2] Notary Position Law (UUJN). (2010).
[3] Criminal Code. (2010).

Appendices

[1] Case Study of the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1099/K/Pid.B/2010.
[2] Notary Position Law (UUJN).
[3] Criminal Code.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Juridical Analysis of the Notary who Committed a Criminal Offense of Forgery of Information in the Authentic Deed

Q: What is the role of a notary in society?

A: A notary plays a crucial role in providing authentic written evidence related to events or legal actions involving parties present. They are responsible for creating and verifying the authenticity of documents, such as deeds, contracts, and wills.

Q: What is the significance of the notary deed?

A: The notary deed has a valid proof power according to the law, and is recognized as evidence that has a perfect value. This perfection value is supported by statements made in the notary deed.

Q: What is the difference between a notary and a lawyer?

A: A notary is responsible for creating and verifying the authenticity of documents, while a lawyer provides legal advice and representation. While notaries and lawyers may work together, they have different roles and responsibilities.

Q: What is the penalty for a notary who commits forgery of information in an authentic deed?

A: According to the Criminal Code, a notary who commits forgery of information in an authentic deed can be subject to appropriate criminal sanctions, including imprisonment and fines.

Q: How can a notary prevent forgery of information in an authentic deed?

A: A notary can prevent forgery of information in an authentic deed by ensuring that the information contained in the deed is accurate and truthful. They must also verify the identity of the parties involved and ensure that the deed is properly executed.

Q: What is the importance of education and training for notaries?

A: Education and training are essential for notaries to understand their role and responsibilities, as well as the laws and regulations that govern their practice. This can help prevent errors and ensure that notaries are aware of the legal consequences of their actions.

Q: How can the law be improved to prevent forgery of information in authentic deeds?

A: The law can be improved by revising the Notary Position Law (UUJN) to include provisions that specifically regulate the criminal offense of information for authentic deeds. This can provide legal certainty and better protection for all parties involved.

Q: What is the role of the government in regulating the notary profession?

A: The government has a responsibility to regulate the notary profession and ensure that notaries are aware of the laws and regulations that govern their practice. This can include providing education and training, as well as enforcing penalties for notaries who commit forgery of information in authentic deeds.

Q: How can the public protect themselves from notaries who commit forgery of information in authentic deeds?

A: The public can protect themselves by ensuring that they work with a reputable and licensed notary. They should also verify the authenticity of documents and ensure that the information contained in them is accurate and truthful.

Q: What is the future direction of research on this topic?

A: Future research can build upon this study by exploring the social and economic implications of forgery of information in authentic deeds. Additionally, a more comprehensive analysis of the legal aspects of the case can be conducted by considering multiple case studies.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: This study has several limitations, including the fact that it is based on a single case study and does not consider the social and economic implications of forgery of information in authentic deeds. Future research can build upon this study to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the issue.

Q: What are the recommendations for future research?

Q: What is the conclusion of this study?

A: In conclusion, the juridical analysis of the notary who committed a criminal offense of information in the authentic deed highlights the importance of revising the Notary Position Law (UUJN) to include provisions that specifically regulate the criminal offense of information for authentic deeds. Additionally, the need for education and increasing understanding of the application of criminal sanctions that can be imposed on notaries is essential.